BUCHAREST, ROMANIA: Former kickboxer Andrew Tate, now a self-proclaimed social media influencer, has predominantly expressed his admiration for Jake Paul rather than Logan Paul.
In a recent tweet, Tate responded to a question from retired Canadian actor David Sutcliffe regarding whom he should interview next. Tate suggested that Logan could use some assistance.
Tate has consistently favored Jake, asserting that Jake is a superior boxer compared to his brother. As Logan's fight with MMA fighter Dillon Danis draws near, he is becoming the target of insults and provocative comments from Danis and even Danis's fiancee. In light of this, Tate proposed that interviewing Logan would be the ideal choice.
Andrew Tate suggests Logan Paul for David Sutcliffe's next interview
Sutcliffe tweeted, "Who should I interview next?" In response, Tate acknowledged that Logan might require assistance in some form, implying that he could benefit from additional support or guidance in the context of the interview.
This acknowledgment hints at the possibility of challenges or issues that Logan may be facing, prompting Tate's suggestion that assistance could be valuable.
Fans perceived Tate's suggestion of the Pauls' inclusion in the interview as a sarcastic dig. Tate and Paul aren't exactly friends; instead, they've engaged in ongoing online conflicts, provoking each other for quite a while. They have exchanged comments and statements through videos and podcasts, fueling their feud.
Tate wrote, "Logan probably needs some help."
Andrew Tate's fans want him to make Logan Paul 'masculine'
Tate's suggestion to feature Logan in an interview with Sutcliffe prompted a significant number of viewers to come forward and share their perspectives.
One user wrote, "No, isolate Logan as much as possible, don't encourage him by acknowledging him... Less Logan is better for the world..." Another user wrote, "Danis been cooking him recently."
A user stated, "You should help him and make him masculine again." Someone commented, "Maybe you should reach out to him ?"
